Think Local First

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Disarticulation
  • World Trade Organization
  • Social benefit
  • Automated Teller Machine
  • Bankroll

Think Local First

Header Banner

Think Local First

  • Home
  • Disarticulation
  • World Trade Organization
  • Social benefit
  • Automated Teller Machine
  • Bankroll
World Trade Organization
Home›World Trade Organization›Special economic zones: not so special, after all!

Special economic zones: not so special, after all!

By Loretta Hudson
February 12, 2022
0
0

The recent budget mentions the replacement of the Special Economic Zones (SEZ) Act with new “legislation that will enable states to become partners in the ‘development of business and service centers'”. The circle is complete for the SEZs which, when they were introduced in the 2004-2005 budget, were presented as engines of growth. All existing Free Trade Zones/Software Technology Parks fell within the scope of the new SEZ Act.

SEZs are conceptually a “geographical region within the nation-state in which a distinct legal framework provides a more liberal economic policy than that prevailing in the rest of the country”. This geographical area is declared outside the normal customs territory of India. Thus, SEZs benefit from several tax advantages, both direct and indirect, apart from other facilities. Benefits granted to SEZ units are conditional on obtaining Net Foreign Exchange (NFE) – defined as the value of exports minus the value of imports. SEZs are tasked with the objective creating job opportunities, encouraging investment (both domestic and foreign) and increasing India’s share in the global market.

The information sheet on SEZs (as of January 27, 2021) available on the official site would suggest that there are 268 operational SEZs compared to 425 officially approved and that the operational SEZs are doing well with regard to the regime’s objectives.
The Comptroller and Accountant General (CAG) did not share this rosy outlook. The CAG performance audit report on the operation of SEZs point out shortcomings in their performance. The report suggests that while the total amount of exemptions enjoyed by the SEZs was around Rs 1.76 lakh crore, the performance of the sampled SEZs was not commensurate. Non-performances were observed in employment (ranging from 65.95 to 96.58%), investments (ranging from 23.98 to 74.92%) and exports (ranging from 46.16 to 93, 81%). The report suggests that the achievements are due to a few SEZs which were mostly established before the enactment of the SEZ law.
The 83rd Reporting of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Commerce on the Operation of SEZs, June 2007, also disapproved of the misuse of land allocated to SEZs. The 40th Report of the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) on the performance of the SEZs presented at the 17th Lok Sabha also remarked that the targets had not been met and that the overall performance was “well below projections”. The PAC noted that only 39.78% of the SEZs had become operational and that 52% of the land was unused. The Committee noted significant misappropriation of land acquired for public purposes.

In this context, the government had in 2018 set up a committee under the chairmanship of Baba Kalyani to study the policy of SEZs. The Committee has been tasked with proposing a policy framework for adopting strategic policy measures that help India capitalize on global growth opportunities while developing its own highly competitive manufacturing and services base.

The Committee has since submitted its report. He proposed renaming the SEZs as 3E – Employment and Economic Enclave, with the aim of moving from an “island of exports to a catalyst for economic growth and employment”. The 3Es would aim to bring together all categories of investors who enable economic activity or the creation of jobs and investments, targeted at domestic demand. Separate recommendations have been made for stakeholders operating in the manufacturing and service sectors.

Another development that took place around this time was at the World Trade Organization (WTO). The United States had filed a dispute regarding India’s export incentives for five programs, including the SEZs. The WTO considered these SEZ benefits to be contrary to the WTO’s Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM) provisions since they tied the benefits to the earning of foreign exchange. Although India has appealed the order, it is clear that we take these developments seriously. The announcement in the budget was not unexpected.

So, when shaping the contours of the new regime, we would do well to look closely at the concerns raised by the CAG and at the WTO. We would do well to look at existing export programs. Customs Department Runs Efficient and Trade-Friendly Program – MOOVR (Manufacturing and Other Warehouse Operations Regulations). Under these regulations, capital goods and raw materials can be imported duty-free into a bonded facility. Duties are deferred – and where imported inputs are used in the manufacture of exported goods, basic customs duties and IGST are exempt and GST zero-rated. A single point of approval, an unlimited shelf life of the stored goods, no geographical restriction on the opening of the manufacturing warehouse make it an attractive proposition.

We must ensure that we have a “smart” export program in place. One that does not degenerate into a land grabbing scheme. One that would help boost exports, help India reach its ambitious goal of reaching $1 trillion by 2025 and would also be WTO compliant. The Budget Speech also proposes to run the SEZs on the very robust and proven National Customs Portal – this should further add to the “smartness” of the system.

— The author is a former president of the Central Commission for Indirect Taxes and Customs

Related posts:

  1. Defying the Covid-19 pandemic: Sustained exports of ‘commodities’ sign a commerce benefit
  2. China’s financial rebound is ‘essential’ for world commerce: WTO chief
  3. Uneven and gradual vaccinations may derail rebound in world commerce: WTO | Enterprise and financial information
  4. Time to take a critical have a look at reforming the World Commerce Group
Tagsorganization wtotrade organizationunited statesworld trade

Categories

  • Automated Teller Machine
  • Bankroll
  • Disarticulation
  • Social benefit
  • World Trade Organization